<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>visionary &amp;mdash; paradise</title>
    <link>https://paradise.writeas.com/tag:visionary</link>
    <description>Hello, I am a 300-odd trillion year old lightbeing taking the form of a human, perpetually writing blogs since the mid 1990s. </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 09:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>visionaries</title>
      <link>https://paradise.writeas.com/visionaries?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[I wish we could tag other people&#39;s posts -- I know a few people who I&#39;d mark as #visionary -- which would help others who are seeking visionaries, and not just regular human condition stuff. &#xA;&#xA;Saw a tweet yesterday that I&#39;ll try to recreate from memory, because I don&#39;t remember who twote it (not my feed). &#xA;&#xA;Said something about...&#xA;&#xA;When men experience paranoia they do so in systemic scale (alien abduction, govt conspiracy theories)&#xA;&#xA;When women experience paranoia they do so at a personal scale (crystal woo, ... and some other stuff I can&#39;t remember)&#xA;&#xA;So&#xA;&#xA;In that way, &#xA;&#xA;Is it sexist to want to see more systemic visionariness? I think women are perfectly capable of systemic thinking. Self nominated case in point. Maybe I&#39;m delusional or an exception, but I don&#39;t think so. I have an PHD in overthinking says my girlfriend. But see, so does she. &#xA;&#xA;If we fairer sex were all so liberated to think. &#xA;&#xA;Anyway. #visionary tag. For those expansive thinkers out there, male or female. &#xA;&#xA;Just some thoughts from paradise.&#xA;&#xA;!--more-- &#xA;.:~:..:~:..:~:..:~:..:~:..:~:..:~:..:~:..:~:..:~:.&#xA;published not proofread. #NeverLookBackspace! Words, Ideas, Magic copyrighted by Zem in Paradise. this is confidential communication. Protected by US and International law.]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish we could tag other people&#39;s posts — I know a few people who I&#39;d mark as <a href="https://paradise.writeas.com/tag:visionary" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">visionary</span></a> — which would help others who are seeking visionaries, and not just regular human condition stuff.</p>

<p>Saw a tweet yesterday that I&#39;ll try to recreate from memory, because I don&#39;t remember who twote it (not my feed).</p>

<p>Said something about...</p>

<p>When men experience paranoia they do so in systemic scale (alien abduction, govt conspiracy theories)</p>

<p>When women experience paranoia they do so at a personal scale (crystal woo, ... and some other stuff I can&#39;t remember)</p>

<p>So</p>

<p>In that way,</p>

<p>Is it sexist to want to see more systemic visionariness? I think women are perfectly capable of systemic thinking. Self nominated case in point. Maybe I&#39;m delusional or an exception, but I don&#39;t think so. I have an PHD in overthinking says my girlfriend. But see, so does she.</p>

<p>If we fairer sex were all so liberated to think.</p>

<p>Anyway. <a href="https://paradise.writeas.com/tag:visionary" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">visionary</span></a> tag. For those expansive thinkers out there, male or female.</p>

<p>Just some thoughts from paradise.</p>

 

<p>.:<em>~</em>:.<em>.:<em>~</em>:.</em>.:<em>~</em>:.<em>.:<em>~</em>:.</em>.:<em>~</em>:.<em>.:<em>~</em>:.</em>.:<em>~</em>:.<em>.:<em>~</em>:.</em>.:<em>~</em>:..:<em>~</em>:.
published not proofread. <a href="https://paradise.writeas.com/tag:NeverLookBackspace" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">NeverLookBackspace</span></a>! Words, Ideas, Magic copyrighted by Zem in Paradise. this is confidential communication. Protected by US and International law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://paradise.writeas.com/visionaries</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 23:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>